🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.