🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an celebration that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, expanding to include functions where individuals of African heritage are compensated to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has evolved since that time, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the observance is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Little demonstrates how important it is to rethink Black History Month better than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to say that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Meanwhile, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the state. A effort to scrub African American heritage and experience from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the former president's first executive orders targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the month represents how little it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has basic knowledge of the bygone era when it fails to address the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Establishments who mark it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and awareness of minor insults, but challenged by the dangers that face all if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and adaptive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Black History is Now Month.