🔗 Share this article

Authorities have called it as a major frauds of its kind in the United Kingdom.

In all 14 defendants have been convicted for their role in a multi-million pound plot to swindle more than 3,500 holiday ownership holders.

The victims were desperate to get out of long-standing timeshare contracts and sought out assistance.

The majority were from 60 and 80. Over 500 of them surrendered over £10,000, and a single victim paid more than £80,000.

Those targeted were subjected to high-pressure presentations extending for six hours. They were financially worse off, owning worthless fake "credits" and continued to be locked into costly vacation property deals they frequently were unable to use.

The Business Behind the Scam

The company at the core of the scam was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They collected customers' funds to fund the directors' lavish lifestyle of prestigious schooling, millionaire mansions and personal aircraft.

The individual at the helm of the organization, the main defendant, was given a 90-month jail time in January for deceptive scheme.

Recently, his wife one of the co-defendants was one of the final three to receive sentencing.

She was handed a two-year long suspended jail sentence at the judicial venue after admitting financial crime.

The outcome represents a lengthy process and signifies a huge win for the individuals who testified, the police and legal representatives.

The Way the Inquiry Started

I first heard about the firm was in the mid-2016. The role involved in the research department of a media outlet, making current affairs features.

A friend noted that his parent had taken over the use of a vacation unit in Spain and, after years of holidays, had begun looking to terminate the deal.

It is important to recall how common vacation properties had evolved with British holidaymakers in the 1980s and 1990s.

Timeshares allowed individuals to occupy the equivalent unit every year, or swap their vacation periods with additional holders who had apartments in alternative destinations. Approximately 600,000 sun-lovers accepted that chance.

The initial boom was linked to a lot of stories about unscrupulous sellers mis-selling properties. They appeared frequently on public interest broadcasts.

The common vacation property deal locked buyers for long periods.

In that period, those investors who had used their regular accommodation in the sun for a long time were advancing in years, and a significant number were hoping to say farewell to their holiday properties.

Some had health issues and found it difficult to access their properties. Others just thought they'd got all they wanted from them. And some had passed away, in many cases leaving their family members to take over the contracts - along with their annual payments and upkeep costs.

The Investigation Unfolds

It was at this point the friend's mum had ended up. She browsed the internet for options and discovered SMT, a firm whose website claimed to terminate her contract.

Yet, having paid a fee and scheduled a consultation with them, her loved ones became suspicious.

Further research showed many victims saying they had paid money and achieved no result in return. Indeed, they had lost money. Significant sums.

Our team started looking into what was happening. It soon emerged that there were dubious individuals working within the holiday ownership market.

An attorney had numerous client reports waiting to sue SMT.

Reporters contacted clients who had used the firm and they collectively described identical situations. They thought the company would acquire their investment from them but when they attended a meeting (for which they submitted funds initially) they were informed there was no potential buyers.

In place of that, they were pushed - in fact compelled - to commit further cash investing in "the firm's incentive scheme", linked to the outfit's parent company, the parent organization.

What exactly these were was rather ambiguous. They seemed similar to a type of exchange medium, offering reduced-price holidays and amenities and consumer discounts.

And they were apparently "tradable" with other owners, some time down the line.

Committing funds at the time would produce an long-term benefit that would pay for SMT's fees and result in the timeshare holder in profit, liberated eventually from their pesky deal.

An unbelievable offer? Indeed, it was.

A 'Deceptive Tactic'

If these accounts were true, this was a massive scam.

The technique is termed a "bait-and-switch."

A business - specifically the company - "lures the consumer by marketing a particular product only to then state it cannot be provided, pushing the client towards a different, lower-quality product or service.

This is against the law. Possessing all the accounts we had collected, we presented the rationale to covertly record one of the company's meetings.

The process requires dedication, work, and strong justifications for why this is the exclusive approach to collect the information necessary to demonstrate illegal activity.

Armed with that permission, our small team organized a appointment with one of the organization's staff in Stratford-Upon-Avon.

Acting as a ordinary individual wanting to help his mother out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement